Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Location Tracking


There are multiple things that I can disagree and agree with concerning this topic. When it comes to the animal situation, it is very much like the child situation. By implanting a chip into a child, it invades their privacy, and takes away their rights as an individual. There are many risks when it comes to this topic including if the password or the device telling the parent the child’s location was broken into and stolen, leaving their children to be able to be tracked by a stranger.  Everyone is entitled to his or her own privacy; however, having these chips implanted is taking away their rights. When it comes to benefits, the only time that I think that this potentially could be acceptable is if the child continuously is putting itself in danger due to the fact that they wonder off by themselves. I do not think this thing should be permanent, but temporary until the child can learn how to communicate with their parents about where they are going and where they are expected to be in the future. I do not think it is right to have chips implanted in a teenager. They have the ability to communicate to their parents in most cases, and even though some teenagers misbehave more than others, there needs to be another way for the parents to be able to figure out where their children are because tracking them is invading their privacy. If there was a bill in congress to require ID chips in children under the age of five, I am not sure as to whether I would support it or not. I think that there are times when a family needs this due to certain circumstances, but there are other families that don’t because the parents feels that there is not problem, or potential danger, when it comes to keeping track of their kids. I think that it is a very creative idea having GPS shoes because it could help protect a loved one with a mental illness or disability from becoming harmed. I do think that if it were possible, to discuss this option with the person who would be wearing the shoes, even though you might not get a very straight answer due to the senior’s forgetfulness. GPS could prevent them from danger in the future, but there is always the fact that someone could find out where the person is by hacking into the device where one can see where they are located. This is a very had topic to answer because everyone should have a say in their privacy; however, there are certain times when one cant speak for themselves, leaving it up to someone else to decide. 

3 comments:

  1. I completely agree with you about putting computer chips into children and teenagers. Everyone should have rights to his or her own privacy and putting computer chips into someones body takes away their privacy. I also agree with you about GPS shoes because it does no physical harm to the body.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with what you said about the chips being temporary. The parents could use the chip until their child learns how to communicate with them better, and it wouldn't completely be invading their privacy. I also would have to agree with what you said about the chip falling into the wrong hands. The risk of a child being tracked by a stranger is very dangerous.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you on the aspect of chips being temporary, but I also look at the chips of more of a means of helping a parent raise a child. I understand the idea of personal freedoms, but at such a young age would a computer chip really have that much effect on a young child's mind or impose on its freedoms? I find the whole situation to be an interesting one and am curious to see what the future holds for such situations.

    ReplyDelete